The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is a widely used self-assessment tool designed to measure your general level of daytime sleepiness. Developed by Dr. Murray Johns in 1991, the ESS helps identify excessive daytime sleepiness, a symptom commonly associated with sleep disorders such as insomnia, sleep apnea, narcolepsy, and more.
The ESS evaluates how likely you are to doze off or fall asleep in eight common situations, each reflecting routine daily activities. By assessing your likelihood of dozing off in these situations, the ESS quantifies your daytime sleepiness and helps determine if further evaluation or treatment might be beneficial.
The ESS consists of eight scenarios where you rate your chance of falling asleep or dozing off on a scale from 0 to 3:
0: Would never doze
1: Slight chance of dozing
2: Moderate chance of dozing
3: High chance of dozing
The scenarios include situations such as sitting and reading, watching TV, or riding as a passenger in a car.
Your ESS score is calculated by summing your responses for each of the eight scenarios. Total scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater daytime sleepiness.
0–7: Normal daytime sleepiness
8–9: Mild sleepiness
10–15: Moderate sleepiness (suggests possible clinical significance)
16–24: Severe daytime sleepiness (requires medical evaluation)
The ESS is particularly valuable if you’re experiencing persistent fatigue, sleepiness, or difficulty staying awake during the day, which can significantly impact your daily functioning. Healthcare providers often use ESS scores alongside other assessments to diagnose sleep disorders and guide treatment plans.
After calculating the ESS total score, clinicians interpret the result to gauge the severity of a person’s daytime sleepiness. In general, higher scores mean greater levels of EDS (Excessive Daytime Sleepiness). The following score ranges are commonly used as a guide to interpretation:
It’s worth noting that different sources sometimes use slightly different cut-offs or descriptors for these ranges. The overarching idea, however, is that an ESS total above 10 falls outside the normal range and signals excessive sleepiness. Clinicians use these thresholds as rough guidelines rather than absolute criteria, considering the patient’s overall context. For example, an ESS of 16 in a patient with loud snoring and observed apneas would strongly point toward obstructive sleep apnea, whereas an ESS of 12 in an otherwise healthy person might prompt looking for subtler issues (like mild sleep deprivation or an emerging sleep disorder). In summary, the ESS score interpretation helps stratify patients by their sleepiness level: normal vs. mildly, moderately, or severely sleepy, which in turn guides the urgency and type of further evaluation.
The effectiveness of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) hinges on two critical psychometric properties: reliability and validity. Understanding these properties ensures that the ESS provides consistent and accurate assessments of sleepiness.
Reliability refers to the consistency of a measurement tool—whether it yields the same results under consistent conditions. For the ESS, reliability is evaluated through two main aspects:
Test-Retest Reliability: This assesses whether the ESS produces similar scores when administered to the same individual on different occasions, assuming no significant change in their sleepiness levels.
In Healthy Individuals: A study involving 87 healthy medical students found that their ESS scores remained stable over a 5-month period, with a high correlation coefficient of 0.82. This indicates strong test-retest reliability in non-clinical populations.
In Clinical Populations: However, in clinical settings—such as among patients with sleep disorders—the ESS has shown greater variability. For instance, research involving patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) reported higher test-retest variability, with discrepancies in scores of 5 points or more observed in up to 42% of cases over intervals ranging from 11 to 91 days. This suggests that while the ESS is reliable in healthy individuals, its consistency may diminish in clinical populations, potentially due to fluctuations in sleep patterns or other health-related factors.
Internal Consistency: This evaluates whether the items within the ESS measure the same underlying concept of sleepiness.
Validity refers to the extent to which a tool measures what it is intended to measure. For the ESS, validity encompasses several dimensions:
Construct Validity: This determines whether the ESS accurately measures the concept of daytime sleepiness.
Criterion Validity: This examines how well the ESS scores correlate with other established measures of sleepiness.
Discriminant Validity: This assesses the ESS’s ability to distinguish between different groups based on their sleepiness levels.
While the ESS is a valuable tool for assessing daytime sleepiness, it’s essential to consider certain limitations:
Subjectivity: As a self-reported measure, the ESS relies on individuals’ perceptions of their sleepiness, which can be influenced by personal biases or lack of awareness.
Variability in Clinical Settings: The increased test-retest variability observed in clinical populations suggests that factors such as fluctuating sleep patterns, treatment interventions, or health status changes can affect ESS scores over time.
Cultural and Linguistic Adaptations: The ESS has been translated into multiple languages and adapted for various cultures. Ensuring the translated versions maintain the original’s reliability and validity is crucial for accurate assessments across different populations.
In conclusion, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing daytime sleepiness, particularly in healthy individuals. Its ease of use and strong psychometric properties make it a valuable tool in both clinical and research settings. However, when interpreting ESS scores, especially in clinical populations, it’s important to consider potential variability and the subjective nature of self-reported measures.
The ESS alone does not diagnose specific sleep disorders but indicates the presence and severity of daytime sleepiness, prompting further medical evaluation if necessary.
You can retake the ESS periodically, especially if you notice changes in your sleep patterns or daytime alertness.
A high ESS score suggests excessive daytime sleepiness that may require professional assessment. Consider consulting a healthcare provider or sleep specialist for further evaluation and management.
Yes, the ESS is valuable for tracking changes in your daytime sleepiness levels, particularly during or after treatment for sleep-related issues.
If your ESS score suggests moderate to severe daytime sleepiness, consider speaking with a clinical psychologist or sleep specialist for a comprehensive assessment and treatment options.
Investigate other validated measures to assess insomnia, sleep quality, sleep hygiene, and factors like daytime sleepiness or beliefs about sleep. Track patterns with our sleep diary or visit our assessment hub for a full overview of insomnia assessment.
Chervin, R. D., Aldrich, M. S., Pickett, R., & Guilleminault, C. (1997). Comparison of the results of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and the Multiple Sleep Latency Test. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 42(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(96)00239-5
Johns, M. W. (1991). A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Sleep, 14(6), 540–545. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/14.6.540
Johns, M. W. (1992). Reliability and factor analysis of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Sleep, 15(4), 376–381. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1519015/
Johns, M. W. (1993). Daytime sleepiness, snoring, and obstructive sleep apnea: the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Chest, 103(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.103.1.30
Kendzerska, T. B., Smith, P. M., Brignardello-Petersen, R., Leung, R. S., & Tomlinson, G. A. (2014). Evaluation of the measurement properties of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale: a systematic review. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 18(4), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2013.08.002
Olson, L. G., Cole, M. F., & Ambrogetti, A. (1998). Correlations among Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores, Multiple Sleep Latency Tests, and psychological symptoms. Journal of Sleep Research, 7(4), 248–253. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2869.1998.00123.x
2 Warwick Avenue, Cammeray, NSW 2062
Copyright © 2025 Angus Munro Psychology